Imagine you're sitting in a cozy corner of your favorite café, enveloped in the aroma of freshly brewed coffee. Across the table sits a friend, curious and open-minded, yet skeptical about matters of faith. It's in this setting that we embark on a journey through the rich tapestry of ontological arguments, inviting exploration and dialogue. Ontological arguments, while sounding complex, are philosophical reflections on the nature of existence and the concept of God. They're like thought experiments that encourage us to ponder the possibility of a divine presence beyond our tangible reality. As believers, it's our privilege to engage in thoughtful conversation, offering insights that inspire wonder and curiosity. 

Let's begin with the classic argument proposed by Saint Anselm, a renowned theologian and philosopher from the 11th century. Anselm invites us to consider the very idea of God – a being greater than which none can be conceived. It's akin to imagining the most perfect island paradise imaginable – and then realizing that it must exist, for a truly perfect island wouldn't be perfect if it only existed in our minds. Now, let's fast forward to the 20th century and meet Alvin Plantinga, a contemporary philosopher who revitalized the age-old argument. Plantinga introduces the concept of "possible worlds," suggesting that if God exists in any possible world, then He exists in all possible worlds – including ours. It's like saying that if there's even a chance of winning the lottery, then you're a winner in every possible outcome. 

R.C. Sproul, a beloved theologian and apologist, further deepened our understanding of the ontological arguments. He emphasized the distinction between necessary and contingent beings, highlighting the unique status of God as a necessary being. Contingent beings depend on external factors for their existence, while a necessary being, such as God, exists by the very necessity of His own nature. If anything exists, then the purposive mind, God, must exist as the only self-existent being. Sproul's insights shed light on the profound implications of God's existence as a foundational reality. Greg Bahnsen, another influential figure in Christian apologetics, contributed to the discourse with his rigorous defense of the ontological argument. Bahnsen emphasized the coherence of the concept of God as the ultimate foundation of reality. He argued that denying the existence of God leads to logical absurdities and undermines the very basis of rational thought. Bahnsen's work challenges skeptics to grapple with the logical consequences of their disbelief and invites them to consider the coherence of the Christian worldview. 

Dutch-American philosopher Cornelius Van Til's approach to apologetics centers on the presuppositional method, which asserts that all human thought and reasoning are grounded in the existence of God. Rather than treating God's existence as a hypothesis to be proven, Van Til invites us to recognize it as the presupposition that underpins all rational inquiry. In this light, ontological arguments take on a deeper significance, serving not only as intellectual exercises but as reflections of our fundamental reliance on God's existence for coherent thought and reasoning. Van Til's perspective challenges us to reconsider the very framework through which we approach ontological arguments. Instead of viewing God's existence as a hypothetical conclusion drawn from human reasoning, Van Til suggests that it is the very foundation upon which rationality itself rests. In this sense, Anselm's argument becomes not just a philosophical exercise but a profound recognition of the ultimate source of all meaning and coherence in the universe. Similarly, Van Til's perspective sheds new light on Alvin Plantinga's concept of "possible worlds." While Plantinga's argument highlights the logical possibility of God's existence in various hypothetical scenarios, Van Til's presuppositional framework invites us to see God's existence as the necessary precondition for the existence of any possible world. Without God as the ultimate ground of reality, the very concept of "possible worlds" loses its coherence and significance. 

As believers, we approach these arguments not with arrogance or superiority, but with humility and openness. We recognize that they're not intended to coerce belief but to spark curiosity and contemplation. We share them with non-believing friends as invitations to explore the mysteries of existence together, fostering meaningful dialogue and mutual understanding. Our goal is not to win arguments but to build bridges of connection and trust. We seek to engage with non-believing friends in a spirit of warmth and empathy, offering insights that inspire curiosity and invite reflection. So, the next time you find yourself in conversation with a non-believing friend, consider sharing these insights with a warm smile and a genuine desire for connection. Invite them to ponder the possibility of a divine presence, encouraging them to explore the beauty of faith at their own pace. May grace, humility, and a shared pursuit of truth mark our conversations. May we journey together in curiosity and wonder, discovering the depth and richness of God's existence as we explore the mysteries of life and faith. "but in your hearts regard Christ the Lord as holy, ready at any time to give a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you. Yet do this with gentleness and reverence, " 1 Peter 3:15
​